Woman awarded £80,000 after suing man previously cleared of raping her

A woman has been awarded £80,000 in damages in a civil case against a man who had previously been cleared of raping her.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, sued Stephen Coxen, accusing him of raping her in St Andrews, Fife, after a night out in September 2013.

Coxen (pictured), of Bury in Lancashire, denied the charges and in November 2015 a jury acquitted him on a not-proven verdict in a criminal trial.

A civil case was raised at the Personal Injury Court in Edinburgh over the incident and Sheriff Robert Weir QC ruled that it was rape, with £80,000 to be paid in damages to the woman.

In his written judgment, Sheriff Weir said: “Mr Di Rollo (the woman’s lawyer) invited me to conclude that the evidence for the pursuer was cogent, compelling and persuasive. I agree with that characterisation of the evidence.

“I therefore determine that at some time between 2am and 2.30am on Saturday September 14 2013, at (the address), the defender took advantage of the pursuer when she was incapable of giving meaningful consent because of the effects of alcohol, that he continued to do so even after she manifested distress and a measure of physical resistance, and that he raped her.

“Accordingly, I shall grant decree against the defender in the agreed sum of £80,000 with judicial interest to run from September 21 2018 until payment.”

Sheriff Weir ruled the woman was drunk, “resulting in a lack of capacity to make free agreement”.

He described her as a “credible and reliable witness”.

The sheriff added: “She gave her evidence in a way which I found convincing on all of the material points.

“At times in her evidence the pursuer became emotional. I found it impossible to conclude that this manifestation of emotion was anything other than a genuine response to the recounting of traumatic events from her recent past, and in particular the night of 13/14 September 2013.

“Her distress was evident and, so far as these things can be judged, seemed to me to be entirely genuine.”

The sheriff said he has “reservations” about Mr Coxen’s evidence in the civil case.

He said: “The paucity of detail in his description of the night actually extended to the circumstances of his arrival in St Andrews, and what he was doing before reaching the Lizard Lounge late on that Friday night.”

Simon Di Rollo QC, who represented the woman during the civil case, said following the ruling: “The pursuer is an extremely courageous woman.

“It is understandable that she found it impossible to come to terms with the verdict of the jury in the criminal proceedings. Although the findings by the sheriff in these civil proceedings are of assistance, there can be no doubt that her experience of the criminal justice system was unsatisfactory.

“Unfortunately, that is not as unusual as it should be. I think that everyone must strive to ensure that, so far as is possible, others in the future do not feel as let down as she did.”

_{Copyright (c) Press Association Ltd. 2018, All Rights Reserved. Picture (c) Jane Barlow / PA Wire.}